Differences between new United States recommendations and existing European guidelines on the use of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure
Last week the United States Department of Health and Human Services published updated recommendations for the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure to HIV. The evidence is still unclear as to the efficacy of this intervention and this report provides a comprehensive overview of available literature, and discusses the benefits and problems with the administration of PEP in certain circumstances. It also clearly re-emphasises that the most effective way to prevent transmission of HIV is to prevent exposure, and any programme of PEP administration should not replace primary prevention.
Auteur(s) : Blackham J, Almeda J
Année de publication : 2005
Pages : 68-9
En relation avec
Nos dernières actualités
actualité
Appel à candidatures pour le renouvellement du comité de rédaction du...
actualité
Lancement du réseau « chaleur-santé-bâti-urbanisme » : vers des villes et...
actualité